Sunday, March 22, 2009

FRENCH POLISHING III - GRAIN FILLING


INTRO
As usual I found myself confronted with a bewildering amount of options, methods and information, often conflicting information, about what to use and how to go about using it. It is as if almost anything that can be squeezed into the pores is used for grain filling from commercially produced wood fillers, to various glues and egg whites. And then there is pumice. I chose to go with this for no other reason than that was what Milburn's tutorial recommended and it somehow seemed to belong to the French polishing technique. But while some report I read tooted it as an easy, straight forward, old and simple technique, others exclaimed it to be a difficult, cumbersome and insufficient method.

MAKING MUNECAS
But before any grain filling could begin I needed to make some munecas to pad it on with. Milburn's tutorial has a detailed description of how to make a regular one and that is what I followed. Actually, they list several methods but I went with the first one that calls for a cotton t-shirt material cover and a wool core.

I already had the t-shirt material but need to make the core. The Milburns suggest using either wool or cotton for this. As wool has a better ability to absorb and hold moisture I went with that. As per their description I cut out three disc from an old pair of woolen socks, one 1¼", one ¾" and one ½" (32mm, 19mm and 12mm).

In the tutorial they suggest sewing the three discs together but I didn't really see the point in that and just stacked them in the middle of a 4x4" cotton square, neatly folding it around the discs and wound a rubber band around it, creating a little round pad with a nice little cotton handle sticking out above the pad.

TESTING ON SCRAP
As I had no idea how this was going to work I set out to do some test on scrap before starting on the real deal, and I'm very glad I did. As it appeared this pumicing business was quite a different kettle of fish to what I had expected.

The first thing I found out is that "clearing the pumice", a process of saturating the pumice with alcohol, does not make the pumice go clear. Initially I thought that it did, as the term suggests, but it doesn't. It stays gray like wet sand. In fact, it is very fine wet sand.

Secondly, it is not the actual pumice that is meant to fill the grain. Instead it is a slurry of wood and shellac (and inevitably a little bit of pumice), created by the abrasive nature of rubbing the pumiced pad on the wood that is meant to be the filler. If only pumice goes in it will show up as gray streaks in the pores. It looks horrible, unless, of course, you like the look of gray streaks in your wood.

The trick, I discovered, was to use very little little pumice and get the muneca loaded with the right amount of alcohol to dissolve the shellac already on the instrument. If too much pumice was used, the slurry would look gray, if too little was used it wouldn't create the abrasive action needed to get the enough wood in the slurry in the first place. If too little alcohol was used the slurry would look and act like pencil eraser shaving and be too hard to rub into the pores. If too much alcohol was loaded into the muneca, the rubbing action would simply dissolve and take off the shellac that was already on the wood and you would be back to square one. But with the right amount of both a nice dark slurry was created that was easily distributed around the surface and into the pores.

With this experience in the bag I was ready to start the filling.

GRAIN FILLING
The Milburns suggest using FFF pumice for the grain filling (actually in their other, newer tutorial they have switched to FFFF). I wasn't able to find FFF pumice anywhere and ended up buying 1lb FF and 1lb of FFFF instead. Once I realized the pumice was used as an abrasive I opted to go with the coarser grade, as Eugene Clark suggests.

The Milburns also recommend using a salt and pepper shaker to sprinkle the pumice onto a piece of paper and dipping the wet muneca into it to load it. But while this probably works fine I found myself just using my fingertip, dipping it into a small bowl of pumice and rubbing it on the muneca. This way I felt it was easier to see and control how much pumice went on.

With a freshly loaded muneca and a bit of pumice on it, I started rubbing the upper bout of the back using a small circular action. Initially nothing really happened but after a little while the shellac softened and the slurry started to build. Once it was there it quickly went into the pores and the muneca was reloaded ready for a new area.

Once I got the hang of it, the work progressed rather swiftly. After the back was done I went onto the sides and then the neck. Naturally the filling wasn't completely homogeneous, in a few places the pumice was a little too prominent for my liking while others areas showed some open pores and some had excess slurry left on the surface. But a second filling session took care of most of these flaws and altogether I was fairly pleased with the end results; a wonderfully smooth and silky surface. No shellac and oil was used during this process, just alcohol.

PUMICING THE SOUNDBOARD
Milburn's tutorial states that it is not necessary to pumice the soundboard. However, in Somogyi's book he mentions that Eugene Clark feels that the soundboard too will benefit from a session of pumicing. I do have a lot of respect for Ervin Somogyi and it appears that most of my sources lead to Eugene Clark. And so I decided to give it a go with the latter.

But in retrospect I must admit I found it pointless. In fact I think it did more damage than good as I ended up getting some pale slurry from the spruce rubbed into the darker woods in the rosette and purflings. It isn't too noticeable, but still. I don't know if I did something wrong or I altogether missed the point of it, but as of now I don't really get why one should pumice the soundboard.

MAKING A DETAIL MUNECAS
This is a very neat trick I learned from Somogyi's book. I found this particularly handy for grain filling all the fiddly areas such as the head slots and the crest. Here the round muneca, though small in size, still seamed a bit to big to squeeze into all the nook and crannies.

Like the round pad the detail muneca has a square cover but instead of making the center with three woolen disc I made it with a single flat piece of wool slightly smaller in size than the cover and one portion of a corner cut off and laid on top of the cover. The corner of the cover where the center is missing is then folded on top of the center creating a kind of flattened pentagon.

From the center of that fold, roll each side up towards the middle creating an apex at the point where the two sides were rolled from. Ah, look at the photos and you'll see what I mean.

LAST THOUGHT ON GRAIN FILLING WITH PUMICE
In hindsight I'm really glad I went though all the trouble to investigate how to do this. I feel that once I got into the swing of it, it got easier and easier and made more and more sense. Of course there is always room for improvements but I feel it was a good start.

However, it did also make me wonder how applicable this method is when it comes to grain filling very ornate instruments. One thing pumicing the soundboard taught me was that once you start mixing dark and pale woods, trouble is knocking on the door. My guess is that you would probably be OK with say having Maple bindings on a Rosewood body as the Maple isn't porous. But I not so sure what I would do if I had a Cocobolo back with a sapwood center or a Rosewood back with say Ash binding, not to mention very intricate herringbone patterns and other ornate purfling and binding schemes.

I wonder what people did before the advent of epoxies and other modern stuff. I have heard some recommend hide glue, but if that is the case why not stick to hide glue in the first place. I don't really know, but I'm sure there is a perfectly good answer to this out there.

CUTTING WOOL DISCS FOR MUNECA

UNFOLDED MUNECA

FOLDED MUNECA

PUMICE SOAKED IN ALCOHOL, SHELLAC AND OIL

TEST - BUBINGA SCRAP WITH THREE SEAL COATS

TEST - GRAINFILLING WITH TOO MUCH PUMICE

TEST - GRAINFILLING WITH TOO LITTLE ALCOHOL

TEST - GRAIN FILLING WITH MORE ALCOHOL

TEST - SAME PIECE AFTER TWO BODY SESSION

PUMICE

GRAIN FILLING BACK

GRAIN FILLING SIDES

GRAIN FILLING NECK

GRAING FILLING HEEL

FOLDING A DETAIL MUNECA - I

FOLDING A DETAIL MUNECA - II

FOLDING A DETAIL MUNECA - III

FOLDING A DETAIL MUNECA - VI

FOLDING A DETAIL MUNECA - V

GRAIN FILLING NECK/SIDE JOINT

GRAIN FILLING HEAD

GRAIN FILLING HEAD CREST

GRAIN FILLING STRING SLOTS

GRAIN FILLING THROAT

Sunday, March 15, 2009

FRENCH POLISHING II - SEALING


REFERENCES AND SOME THOUGHTS ON FRENCH POLISHING IN GENERAL
I always find myself procrastinating a bit when I enter unknown territory - should I do this or should I do that? I found this to be particularly true when it came to applying the finish to this, my first guitar. I set out to do some research to prepare myself and as per usual I found a mammoth of conflicting advice, instructions and guidance. Everything from what type of cloth to make your muneca from, how to grain fill and with what to types of oil to used as lubricant, etc. etc. etc. seemed to have endless possible variables and arguments as to what and what not to use and do.

I also found a most of the advice and tutorials to be incomplete or at least leaving a novice like myself with a lot of unanswered questions, wondering why the author recommended doing things a certain way, and most importantly what to be careful not to do and how to rectify it if you did. It also annoyed me a great deal that almost all tutorials only showed pictures of the back being polished, conveniently skipping how to deal with all the tricky areas such as the bridge, the headslots.

That being said I also found some good references and writings on the matter. Many people recommended the Milburn Tutorial to be the most complete practical guide for the beginner and after having read it, I decided to use that as my starting point and main reference too. Actually I just recently discovered that there are now two different tutorials on Milburn's site. I think I may have used the other one for no particular reason other than that was the one I stumbled upon by default.

Some other resources I found to be very helpful companions to Milburn's tutorial was:
1) The Chapter on French polishing in Ervin Somogyi's book: "Making the Responsive Guitar", which is basically a transcript of the notes he wrote while taking lessons from Eugene Clark.
2) Cindy Burton's article "French Polishing with Eugene Clark" printed in GAL #54 (Red Book V).
3) "An introduction to French Polishing" By Cindy Burton, Greg Beyers, Robert Steinegger and Buzz Vineyard From GAL #14 (Red Book II)

Other references I used that should be mentioned here are among others Courtnall's book: "Making Master Guitars", Bogdanovich' book: "Classical Guitar Making" and LMI's article on "French Polish".

MATERIALS
The first thing I had to do was to choose the materials to make up the finish and something to apply it with. I quickly found there is a bewildering variety of shellac to choose from, each type of shape, refinement and origin providing some sort of unique quality. But instead of even making a slight attempt to figure out what it all meant, I decided just to take the easy way out and go with what Milburn recommended: Dewaxed flakes in a color of your choice.

Ervin Somogyi recommends buying shellac in large quantities to have a supply of consistent quality to work with as he claims that the properties of the same type of shellac can vary a great deal from supplier to supplier, sometime even from shipment to shipment from the same supplier. Though I'm sure this is sound advice, I felt it would be a bit of an overkill for me to start out with and so I opted to get a 8oz jar of 'blonde' flakes at my local Rockler store. I went for 'blonde' color as it was the palest they had and I wanted to get a fairly clear, non colored finish.

Secondly, I had to make a choice of what solvent to use. I read great many debates about whether to use denaturated alcohol or pure grain alcohol. Advocates of the denaturated variety seems to like it mostly because it is cheap and readily available. In a GAL article I also read that denaturated alcohol should be of more consistent quality as it is made under much stricter guide lines.

People who toot grain alcohol as the solvent of choice seems to be swayed mostly because of it's benign quality. This argument appealed greatly to me, but I soon found that it wasn't so easy to get hold of. Aparently it is illegal to sell the good stuff, 190 proof Everclear, in many states including California. Only the 151 proof is available here. However, I manage to find a store in New Jersey who were willing to ship 4 bottle to me. When I asked them if I could get in trouble for it they just said: "Ah, forget about it".

For application I went with Milburn's recommendation and cut up some old white t-shirts and underpants in 4x4" squares. I was quite surprise how many 4x4's I could get out of a pair of old undies. Maybe it's because I still wear army sized boxer brief. Anyone who has done their national service in the Danish army will know that their underpants only come in two sizes, too big and much too big. Moving on.....

PREPARATION
It was time to dissolve the shellac. Milburn suggest to make a 2lb cut for sealing and bodying and so I did. The 8oz plastic container from Rockler had conveniently divided the flakes up in four bags of 2oz each. I put the content of one bag in a glass jar and added 8oz of grain alcohol. I didn't grind or crush the flakes before adding the alcohol as some suggest to speed up the dissolving of the flakes but just left them as they were. It took roughly 24 hours for them to dissolve completely and that even despite the fact that the flakes had caked together into one lump.

Once dissolved I poured half the mixture into a 8oz squeeze bottle also bought from Rockler, covered my bench with a large piece of felt and I was ready to go.

APPLICATION
As per Milburn's suggestion I started off by sealing the purflings on the back in order to prevent the color from the rosewood back, bubinga in my case, bleeding onto the paler wood.

I folded a piece of 4x4" cotton in half and then once more into quarters. The corner of the first quarter was then loaded with about 12 drops of shellac which was wiped on the first purfling and binding following the contour of the guitar in one steady swoop without stopping at any time. Even though I don't think the bubinga really bled very much, it still showed some contamination. Whether this was from resins and oils in the wood or just dust, I don't know, but the cloth was not clean anymore.

To keep things clean the cloth was refolded to a fresh, uncontaminated section, reloaded with about 6 drops of shellac and the second back purfling was sealed, also in one steady swoop. Refolding to the third clean quarter, the cloth was reloaded with a few drops of shellac and the center strip was sealed the same way.

The last clean quarter was recharged and used to seal each section of the back with a coat of shellac, however this time the shellac was applied using a circular motion. After the whole back had been sealed the cloth was disposed of.

It is important to note that I didn't use oil for this. In the tutorial I followed, it stated: "use no oil or alcohol" and so I didn't. Apparently, the other Milburn tutorial advices: "then apply a drop of oil". This is not, in any way, meant as a criticism of the Milburns as I found their tutorial exceedingly helpful, but it is a prime example of how easy it is for the novice to get confused.

The sides were sealed in a similar fashion. A fresh cloth was loaded and first the purfling and bindings were done in one single sweep, then the joint between side and the neck, refolding the cloth to a fresh quarter and reloading it after each sweep. I winged it a bit when I got to the inlay at the butt, by using that quarter for the side as well.

I used two cloths for the soundboard as I quickly ran out of fresh quarters, having to deal with both purling/bindings, the rosette the bridge and the fingerboard as well as the soundboard itself. But in essence it was done like the back and sides, in one continuous sweep where dark and pale woods were joining and finished off with circular motion on the spruce itself. The same technique was used on neck/fingerboard joint and around the headplate veneers.

As the application of the shellac is done with some pressure it was sometimes hard to keep the guitar steady. This was particularly true when I did the back, as in this case the guitar was resting on the bridge and neck only. Doing the areas close to the sides did get a little hard to control. I've only just become aware that Milburn suggest using a neck rest while polishing. For some reason I must have skipped that part of the tutorial, hence my troubles. I believe Eugene Clark clamps his guitars by the neck while polishing.

For those of you who wonder if a person from Blue Man Group came to help out during this, I can attest that it was in fact me wearing a protective nitrile glove from Lee Valley. I think it was probably spurred on by the photographs of Bogdanovich from his book, applying shellac sporting a similar outfit. But while they did prevent the shellac from getting onto my hand I don't think they were necessary, apart from the fact that I didn't have to wipe dried shellac off your hands afterward and then even so.

Being a one man band, it was particularly hard to photograph this process. As the shellac dries almost instantly I kinda' had only one shot at each process, hence the somewhat odd placement of items in the shots here and there. It was all a bit nerve wrecking.

SECOND PREPARATION
After the first application the guitar was inspected again only to find there was several areas that needed some further attention before I proceeded.

First of all I noticed a few areas where the bindings hadn't been scraped flush with the sides. Actually you can see one of these in my previous post, French Polish I - Preparation, in the close up photo of the rounded edge. I also noticed some ripples in the surface of the back around the heel cap where I had scraped it flush. I think it must have stemmed from scraping in the same direction making the scraper follow and accentuate the ripples as the work proceeded. I hindsight I think these could have been avoided had I just changed direction scraping diagonally every so often.

I also noted a tiny bit of bleeding from the bridge onto the soundboard, but as it was so only very little I decided to let it slide.

Last I found a few area around the heel where traces of chisel marks were still visible, as were some planemarks on the back. These were all carefully sanded back again using StewMac's Stikit120 grit followed by 220 grit. After this the whole guitar got another two seal coats for a total of three.


MY FRENCH POLISHING MATERIALS

SEALING BACK STRIP

SEAL COATING BACK

SEALING SIDES BINDINGS AND PURFLINGS

SEALING ROSETTE

SEALING EDGE OF BRIDGE

SEAL COATING SOUNDBOARD

SEALING FINGERBOARD EDGE

SEALING NECK

SEALING HEAD

CONTAMINATED WIPING CLOTHS

BLEEDING FROM BRIDGE

BINDING DETAIL

ROSETTE DETAIL

HEEL DETAIL

THROAT DETAIL

HEAD DETAIL

GUITAR FINISHED WITH THREE SEAL COATS


Sunday, March 08, 2009

FRENCH POLISHING I - PREPARATION


FILLING GAPS AND FIXING DENTS
The first thing I did was to fill the gaps at the fret ends. This was done by melting a stick of dark brown shellac into the gaps with a soldering iron. I don't know if a soldering iron was the best tool for this as I got the feeling the iron was too hot and burned the shellac as oppose to just melting it. But it was what I had and so it was what I used. Maybe a little alcohol lamp and a pallet knife would have been more suitable. Next time...

Then the whole guitar was inspected from A-Z in an attempt to locate all the dents, gaps, scratches and other imperfections. Inevitably there was a few around, but generally speaking it wasn't too bad. The two worst cases was a fairly deep ding in the soundboard and a tear out from the spokeshave on the side of the fingerboard. That occurred when it was trimmed flush with the neck.

I was considering using the shellac stick to fill the tear out on the fingerboard, but after my experience with the soldering iron I decided just to fill it with some 5-min epoxy, which seemed to work very well. I thought of tinting the epoxy with saw dust but decided not to and just use it clear. It somehow seemed to make a more invisible repair showing the grain of the wood as opposed to having a homogeneously colored blob of filler covering it up.

I made an attempt to steam out the ding in the soundboard using the soldering iron and a damps cloth the create steam. I went at it for quite some time but even though it did lift the indentation, I wasn't able to raise it completely. Eventually I gave up and decided to leave it till later and then decide how to proceed to fix it, if at all.

Other stuff I noticed included small gaps around the bindings but these seemed insignificant enough to be left alone.

SANDING, SANDING AND MORE SANDING
One of the more hidden flaws I detected were tiny ridges left from the plane blade on the back and sides. At this point I had not done any sanding on the surface of the body and these ridges became apparent once the body was held up against a low light. This took me by surprise as I had be very careful to avoid this very thing. But there they were laughing me straight in my face.

I also noticed some waviness running across the grain of the sides together with a few places where the bindings hadn't been trimmed completely flush. I carefully used a scraper to level all these blemishes the best I could.

Next up was rounding the sides. Some people like to create a very soft rounded edge around the body, but personally I prefer a sharper, more defined edge.

In his book Ervin Somogyi states that Eugene Clark recommends using a smooth file for this, working with deliberate stokes in one direction only. I tried this, but I never really got to grips with it. I couldn't really see the benefit of this approach and I had a hard time working in a smooth edge around the inside curve of the waist area. Soon I switched to a cork backed sanding block with 120 grit garnet paper which I had an easier time with. First the edges was treated to a small single bevel that then was rounded over. Having the bevel made it easier to control the homogeneity and evenness of the edge all the way around the body.

The head needed some attention too. The inside of the string slots showed traces of chisel marks from when they were done initially. Likewise a few marks from the drill bit were traceable a the end of the slots.

The inside of the slots were sanded with a flat sanding stick with some of StewMac's Stickit paper, first with 120 grit followed by 220 grit. The rounded ends got a similar treatment though this time a piece of dowel was use as a sanding stick. Like the body the edge of the head and string slots were softened a little, though not quite as much.

WIPING, SANDING, WIPING, SANDING AND WIPING
Now the whole guitar was wiped with Naphtha and inspected once more to see if any other blemishes were showing up. As it looked fine to me I proceeded to sand the entire guitar with 120 grit garnet paper. I really don't like sanding but I guess it has to be done. All that dust everywhere, yuck!

Then it was time to gently wipe the guitar with a very tightly wrung damp cloth. This raised the grain a little and got rid of most of the dust left on the surface from the sanding. The raised grain was leveled by a final sanding using 180 grit garnet paper.

Some people continue sanding ending up with much finer grits, but Eugene Clark recommends stopping a 180 or 220, in order to avoid clogging up the pores with dust, or chocking it as he puts it. I believe Cumpiano recommends stopping at 220 too. Either way it suited me fine keeping sanding to a minimum.

When all was done the entire instrument was dusted and wiped with Naphtha again to get rid of the last bit of dust allowing for one final inspection.


FILLING FRET SLOT GAPS


FILLING TEAR OUT WITH EPOXY

STEAMING OUT DENT

SCRAPING SIDES

SANDING BINDING EDGES

ROUNDED BINDINGS

SANDING FLAT HEAD SLOT SIDES 120 GRIT

SANDING ROUND HEAD SLOT ENDS 220 GRIT

WIPING GUITAR WITH NAPHTHA

FIRST SANDING 120 GRIT

WIPING GUITAR WITH DAMP CLOTH

FINAL SANDING 180 GRIT

WIPING GUITAR DOWN WITH NAPHTHA

THE DETAILED GUITAR